Below are some examples of work that partners of our firm have been engaged in:
1.
Acting for a listed Indonesian publicly listed company engaged Digital Cyber Security, System Integration & Information, Telecommunication System Integration as a responded in a BANI Indonesian arbitration proceeding, relating to a claim for non-payment in an IT supply contract.
2.
Advising a major foreign electronics retailer in relation to Indonesian law aspects and identifying the expert witness in relation to an Indonesian law governed joint venture dispute in a SIAC arbitration proceeding.
3.
Advising an international digital advertising company in relation to the insolvency, dissolution and liquidation of its Indonesian subsidiary.
4.
Acting for a local insurance company as the insurer and the defendant at an Indonesian District Court, relating to a lawsuit filed by the insured for an aircraft accident claim.
5.
Advising a high net-worth Indonesian individual in relation to a shareholder dispute, regarding the construction, operations and management of hotel blocks with a dispute value of IDR 1.2 trillion.
6.
Advising a panel of insurers in relation to a Contractor’s All Risk (CAR) construction insurance claim in Indonesia filed by the building owner relating to a building structural failure in Indonesia with a value of the claim being approximately IDR 1.2 trillion.
7.
Advising the lawyers of the insurer in relation to an aircraft collision in Indonesia and a potential claim and potential litigation.
8.
Representing an Indonesian construction company relating to a construction accident causing damage to a third party property.
9.
Advising a major Japanese construction company as defendant in relation to a joint venture dispute in Indonesia at the Indonesian court. This relates to Indonesian contract law, corporate law, licensing and regulatory law issues in a joint venture dispute and also proceedings in Indonesia pertaining to multiple lawsuits filed at the Central Jakarta District Court.
10.
Advising a major freight forwarding company in relation to a potential dispute regarding its records management contract with its customer.
11.
Working as in-house counsel and conducting investigation and managing criminal litigation proceedings in relation to a criminal investigations proceeding in India for the allegation of a quid-pro-quo bribe.
12.
Conducting investigations of a major international fast moving consumer goods company in relation to the allegation of a bribe to health care workers.
13.
Acting for major Japanese EPC contractor in relation to considering operations of restructuring its business arrangements with its Indonesian partner.
14.
Advising the estate of an international copyright holder in relation to a lawsuit for copyright infringement in Indonesia.
15.
Acting for a hotel in relation to a potential liability claim for the death of a hotel guest, working together with the insurer.
16.
Acting for a listed Indonesian publicly listed company engaged Digital Cyber Security, System Integration & Information, Telecommunication System Integration as a responded in a BANI Indonesian arbitration proceeding, relating to a claim for non-payment in an IT supply contract.
17.
A Global Pharma Company based in Switzerland in an ongoing Arbitration against it Indonesian Distributor before the Singapore International Arbitration Centre;
18.
A Global Pharma Company based in London in its successful efforts for obtaining an anti-suit injunction before the Singapore High Court in conjunction with the Arbitration proceedings filed with the Singapore International Arbitration Centre;
19.
A major Indonesian mining company in its successful defense on an arbitration worth USD 90 million brought by an Indonesian State Owned Company before BANI Arbitration Center;
20.
Itochu Logistics, in a major civil claim filed by its former Indonesian shareholder before the Central Jakarta District Court;
21.
Cargill Indonesia, in an ongoing investigation on selling illegal aqua feed product before the South Sumatera Regional Police;
22.
GSM System Indonesia, in an allegation of contract non-performance by its distributor before the South Jakarta District Court;
23.
A offshore coal trading company in several shareholders disputes against the Indonesian shareholder of its subsidiary operational Indonesian coal mining company, including in a successful representation in certain claims before the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC);
24.
A Japanese-Indonesian Joint Operation in its action before BANI Arbitration with regard to a construction claim in the amount of USD 85 million;
25.
A leading Indonesian integrated plantation group in an ongoing investigation of illegal fire allegation before the West Kalimantan Police Office;
26.
A leading Japanese major motor vehicle parts manufacturer for a leading Japanese motor vehicle manufacturer, in series of property disputes in municipality of Karawang;
27.
A leading Japanese chemical company producing chemical products and industrial materials in an ongoing investigation on corruption allegation before the Attorney General Office of Indonesia;
28.
A leading Japanese steel manufacturer, in several environmental issues before the West Java Environmental Agency and West Java Regional Police;
29.
A leading international fire protection and fire alarm manufacturer and service provider in a successful representation before BANI Arbitration in its claim amounting to USD 56 million;
30.
A leading Swiss insurance company and its insured in an allegation of contract misrepresentation before the Denpasar District Court;
31.
A leading Japanese construction company, in a series of lawsuits worth USD 1.8 billion filed by its former Indonesian partner with regard to the dispute arising out of the MRT project of Jakarta (2013-present);
32.
A leading Japanese heavyweight industry, in a dispute against the Government of Republic Indonesia with regard to non-performance under issue under major construction contract (2015-present);
33.
A Japanese technology conglomerate, in an allegation of customer fraud of USD 25 million before the South Jakarta District Court;
34.
A foreign joint venture independent petroleum storage facility, in a criminal allegation of illegal oil storage before the Special Crime Unit of Indonesia Police Headquarter;
35.
The leading Indonesian newspaper, in a blasphemy claim over a cartoon publication before the Jakarta Regional Police;
36.
A leading Singapore bank in a legation of customer fraud before the Central Jakarta District Court (2014-2015);
37.
Two leading Australian news publication companies, in a class action claim brought a by group of citizens before the Central Jakarta District Court (2011);
38.
A United States oil and gas company, in the dispute before the State Administrative Court of Jakarta with regard to a decision issued by Indonesian Oil and Gas (Downstream) Authority (BPHMigas) (2010-present);
39.
A leading Singapore bank in a Bankruptcy proceedings before the Jakarta Commercial Court (2011-2012);
40.
A United States oil and gas company, in the investigation at the Business Competition Supervisory Body (KPPU) with regard to allegation of tender collusion (2011-2012);
41.
A leading hygiene, health and nutrition brands company, in the product liability matter (2012-2013);
42.
A leading regional cross-media company with regard to several class action claims brought by subscribers of its local disputed investment arms before the Jakarta, Surabaya and Medan District Courts (2010-2012);
43.
A leading regional cross-media company, in an Objection filed by PT. MNC Sky Vision against the Decision of the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) at the West Jakarta District Court (2010-2013);
44.
A state owned company company, as the plaintiff in the proceedings before the Kendari State Administrative Court with regard to the overlapping permit issued by the North Konawe Regent (2010-2012);
45.
A leading Indonesian conglomerate in the defence of proceedings before several District Court over the sales of Sugar Group Companies and cancellation of the companies US$ 175 million loan agreements (2009-present);
46.
An offshore services company, in the defense before the North Jakarta District Court relating to joint venture dispute brought by an Indonesian company (2010-2011);
47.
A German bank, in a dispute concerning undue payment before the Central Jakarta District Court;
48.
A Chinese Technology Company in the allegation of monopolistic practices relating to the fiber optic tender conducted in an Indonesian telecommunications operator company (2010-2011);
49.
A United States Oil and Gas company, in the hearing before BPH Migas with regard to a proposal of increasing the gas transportation tariff submitted by the Indonesian contracting party (2010);
50.
A leading Japanese trading house, in filing a civil request before the Supreme Court of Indonesia with regard to a tax determination on water delivery issued by Indonesian Tax Office (2011);
51.
Advising an Indonesian minister in bailout case of a failed Indonesian bank;
52.
An international oil lubricant company, in a dispute arising out of major distribution arrangement with its local distributor before the South Jakarta District Court (2010); and
53.
A foreign company in representing its local subsidiary in a dispute relating to heavy equipment lease agreement against one of the biggest Indonesian mining companies (2010).